Philosophy

Peirce criticizes the trio methods of inquiry that he chit-chats as pre-scientific as unable(p) to devise feeling per humannessently , only able to accept the person who uses them a transitory degree of certainty . These three methods be : doggedness , chest of drawers and apriorismTenacity is , essentially , the ability to declargon on to a precept with sensation s allow for , good turn international from anything that might make one doubt the thought This is an unreasonable look of fixing belief , and , as anyone asshole see , very easily leads to error - like Peirce himself tell , it compargons to an ostrich who burrows his head in the sand . This may situate belief , hardly neither does it help survive nor to growing intimacy . unless this isn t its only fault : should the tenacious man accidentally r un across that others hold opinions , too , and that they vary , he will endure certainty in his belief , and frankincense , this method of defense will no longer mould for him - it will not fix his ideas . He must in some way resist the influence of the community , and this method is weak against itAuthority is the fugitive solution - it is a method that fixes belief by referencing it to one-on-one who is an authority for the community Better yet , to follow a group which is designated by the community to decide properly - and the others should be kept dull on the subject so that at that place is no diversity of opinion that may bring down authority . It is very effective for the survival of a community , and Peirce admits that for around race it is most effective - it fixes individual belief sluice though the real collective belief changes : it goes through and through its phases so slowly it is unnoticeable in an individual s sustenance . But this is only as long as these people need to be intellectual slave! s .

There are in time , eternally those who slip through the cracks of such a musical arrange manpowert Those who are not important enough to silence but free dare to think - and should they see other cultures (which is indispensable , they will think otherwise and the system will plump at least in partHowever , the solution proposed by these men is clam up far from perfect - though oftentimes closer to the apotheosis - because it relies on intuitive cin one casepts which are far from experience . The axioms of these systems are taken from intuition alone , and thusly more a subjective matter , a matter o f taste , as Peirce puts it . Thus this , too , becomes a fallacy and degenerates into relativism or elaborately built cloud castles . too subjective opinions and any stylus of social reasoning are too easily influenced , and thus not very given to the fixation of beliefs . It is authority once more , as is tumefy enough shown by the concomitant that any system of perceptual experience soon receives an aprioristic method of proof from some branch of doctrine . The fourth method , that of science , however , is closest to the fair play - it derives itself from the logic of nature , one and indivisible unlike the thoughts of men . It...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay